Reviewer Guidelines

Manuscripts submitted to the Vox Populi Law Review undergo an initial screening for thematic relevance and alignment with the journal's aims. Reviewers are requested to conduct an objective, critical, and constructive assessment based on the criteria outlined below.

Title The title should be concise, clear, and reflect the article's main argument or key findings, indicating relevance to the field of Law studies.
Abstract A single paragraph of 150–250 words that explicitly states the research purpose, methodology, main findings, and scholarly contributions.
Keywords Consist of 3–6 words or phrases that represent the main concepts and are relevant to Law studies.
Introduction Ideally 4–7 paragraphs covering the research gap, state of the art, and an explicit statement of the main argument or contribution.
Methodology Presented in 2–3 paragraphs; must clearly explain research types, data sources, collection techniques, and analytical frameworks.
Results and Discussion Core analysis engaging with relevant theories and previous studies, clearly explaining the theoretical, practical, and legal implications.
Conclusion Presented in 2–3 paragraphs; should be reflective and argumentative, highlighting scholarly contributions and future recommendations.
Bibliography Minimum 50% scholarly works from reputable publications, including recent literature from the last 10 years.
Recommendation Accept Submission; Revisions Required; Resubmit for Review; Resubmit Elsewhere; Decline Submission; See Comments.

Note: These reviewer guidelines also serve as a reference for authors to ensure compliance with the academic standards of the Vox Populi Law Review.